The Convention:
The Chemical Weapons Convention came into force on 29th April 1997 - see OPCW - Genesis and Historical Development. A list of State Parties to the Convention is on the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) website. The OPCW Member States represent about 98% of the global population and
landmass, as well as 98% of the worldwide chemical industry.
Salisbury Attack - Attempted Murder:
Watching the Law
18 March, 2018
14 March, 2018
A note on the Chemical Weapons Convention
On 4th March 2018, a "nerve agent" - referred to as "Novichok" (newcomer) - was used in Salisbury, England - CBS News 13th March 2018. The UK Prime Minister - Mrs Theresa May - stated that it was "highly likely" that Russia was responsible for this - see her Statement of Monday 12th March to Parliament.
In this post of 23rd August 2013, chemical weaponry was discussed in connection with the conflict in Syria.
The Chemical Weapons Convention lies at the heart of the position in international law regarding chemical weaponry.
In this post of 23rd August 2013, chemical weaponry was discussed in connection with the conflict in Syria.
The Chemical Weapons Convention lies at the heart of the position in international law regarding chemical weaponry.
03 December, 2017
ICTY Final Judgments - Prosecutor v Jadranko Prlić and others
The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia has delivered its final judgment prior to the Tribunal closing on 31st December.
On 29th November, the Appeals Chamber pronounced its judgement in Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić et al., in what was the Tribunal’s most voluminous appeal as well as its final case. Read the Tribunal's announcement.
The Appeals Chamber affirmed
On 29th November, the Appeals Chamber pronounced its judgement in Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić et al., in what was the Tribunal’s most voluminous appeal as well as its final case. Read the Tribunal's announcement.
The Appeals Chamber affirmed
22 November, 2017
Mladić convicted at ICTY
Ratko Mladić, the former commander of the Bosnian Serb army, has been sentenced to life imprisonment after being convicted of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity by the International Criminal Tribunal for former Yugoslavia (ICTY) at The Hague.
The one-time fugitive from international justice faced 11 charges, two of genocide, five of crimes against humanity and four of violations of the laws or customs of war. He was cleared of one count of genocide, but found guilty of all other charges. The separate counts related to “ethnic cleansing” operations in Bosnia, sniping and shelling attacks on besieged civilians in Sarajevo, the massacre of Muslim men and boys at Srebrenica and taking UN personnel hostage in an attempt to deter Nato airstrikes.
Delivering the verdicts, Judge Alphons Orie said Mladić’s crimes “rank among the most heinous known to humankind and include genocide and extermination."
21 November, 2017
International Court of Justice - UK loses seat
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations - UN Charter Chapter XIV. The court operates according to its Statute and Judges serve for 9 year terms and they may be re-elected by the United Nations.
Judge Christopher Greenwood was elected to the court in November 2008 and was willing to be re-elected. However, it became clear that he was not securing sufficient support within the UN General Assembly and his candidacy was withdrawn - The Guardian 20th November and BBC 21st November - How UK lost ICJ place to India
The result
Judge Christopher Greenwood was elected to the court in November 2008 and was willing to be re-elected. However, it became clear that he was not securing sufficient support within the UN General Assembly and his candidacy was withdrawn - The Guardian 20th November and BBC 21st November - How UK lost ICJ place to India
The result
14 September, 2017
Poland and the EU ~ Notes
Against the background of the road to Brexit adopted by the UK it seems worth looking at the relationship between the EU and the Republic of Poland. The following is in note form only .....
A new Constitution for Poland came into force on 17th October 1997 - Constitution of the Republic of Poland - for Polish constitutional history see HERE.
2004 - Poland acceded to the EU
A new Constitution for Poland came into force on 17th October 1997 - Constitution of the Republic of Poland - for Polish constitutional history see HERE.
2004 - Poland acceded to the EU
In 2014, the EU adopted a Rule of Law Framework - see: Europa - Justice - Rule of Law and Speech by Viviane Reding 18th March 2014. The framework is discussed at Verfassungsblog 28th February 2016 - EU Law and Politics: the Rule of Law Framework
26 June, 2017
Supreme Court of the USA ~ Donald J Trump v International Refugee Assistance Project
Updated October 2017:
President Trump's Executive Order 13780 Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry to the United States has been considered by the Supreme Court of the USA which has allowed a limited version of the Order to take effect pending a full hearing in the Supreme Court this October - Washington Post 26th June 2017
The ban on people entering the U.S. from six mostly Muslim countries can apply for now to everyone except people who have a "credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States."
The court indicated in the ruling that things may change by October. It asked the parties to address whether the case would be moot by the time it hears it.
Update October 2017:
On October 10, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court ended one of the lawsuits challenging the Trump Administration’s travel ban. The Court vacated the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal’s judgment in Trump v International Refugee Assistance Project and remanded the case back to the federal appeals court with instructions to dismiss the suit as moot - Constitutional Law Reporter
On September 24, 2017, the President signed a new Proclamation limiting the entry of certain foreign nationals to the United States. This new proclamation effectively replaces Executive Order 13780, which expired on that same day. The US Department for Homeland Security published further details - HERE. There is on-going litigation regarding the September Proclamation and this may yet reach the Supreme Court.
President Trump's Executive Order 13780 Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry to the United States has been considered by the Supreme Court of the USA which has allowed a limited version of the Order to take effect pending a full hearing in the Supreme Court this October - Washington Post 26th June 2017
The ban on people entering the U.S. from six mostly Muslim countries can apply for now to everyone except people who have a "credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States."
The court indicated in the ruling that things may change by October. It asked the parties to address whether the case would be moot by the time it hears it.
Update October 2017:
On October 10, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court ended one of the lawsuits challenging the Trump Administration’s travel ban. The Court vacated the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal’s judgment in Trump v International Refugee Assistance Project and remanded the case back to the federal appeals court with instructions to dismiss the suit as moot - Constitutional Law Reporter
On September 24, 2017, the President signed a new Proclamation limiting the entry of certain foreign nationals to the United States. This new proclamation effectively replaces Executive Order 13780, which expired on that same day. The US Department for Homeland Security published further details - HERE. There is on-going litigation regarding the September Proclamation and this may yet reach the Supreme Court.
16 April, 2017
Supreme Court of the USA ~ Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch
With effect from 10th April 2017, Judge Neil M Gorsuch is an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the USA. Mr Gorsuch's biography is available via the Supreme Court's website. The court has a Chief Justice - John G Roberts - and 8 Associate Justices. Mr Gorsuch was appointed to fill the vacancy left by the death in February 2016 of Associate Justice Antonin Scalia.
Following a "Confirmation Hearing", Mr Gorsuch was confirmed by the United States Senate 54 votes to 45 - see this article where the process is described.
Justices of the Supreme Court of the USA do not have fixed retirement ages. The longest serving member of the court at this time is Anthony Kennedy appointed in February 1988.
The longest serving justice in the history of the court is William O Douglas who sat from April 1939 to November 1975.
Following a "Confirmation Hearing", Mr Gorsuch was confirmed by the United States Senate 54 votes to 45 - see this article where the process is described.
Justices of the Supreme Court of the USA do not have fixed retirement ages. The longest serving member of the court at this time is Anthony Kennedy appointed in February 1988.
The longest serving justice in the history of the court is William O Douglas who sat from April 1939 to November 1975.
16 March, 2017
State of Hawai'i and Ismail Elshikh v Donald J Trump and others (2)
Update - 29th March - the Temporary Restraining Order was converted to a Preliminary Injunction - Court's Judgment.
-----
The United States District Court for the District of Hawai'i has imposed a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) in respect of sections 2 and 6 of President Donald J Trump's Executive Order 13780 (6th March 2017).
See the Order issued by Judge Derrick K Watson
Section 2 of the EO sought to impose a 90 day ban on entry to the United States of certain nationals of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. (NB: Not Iraq).
Section 6 of the EO sought to suspend for 120 days the US Refugee Admissions Program. Exceptions on a case-by-case basis were to be possible).
The court will set an expedited hearing to decide whether the Order is to be extended.
-----
The United States District Court for the District of Hawai'i has imposed a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) in respect of sections 2 and 6 of President Donald J Trump's Executive Order 13780 (6th March 2017).
See the Order issued by Judge Derrick K Watson
Section 2 of the EO sought to impose a 90 day ban on entry to the United States of certain nationals of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. (NB: Not Iraq).
Section 6 of the EO sought to suspend for 120 days the US Refugee Admissions Program. Exceptions on a case-by-case basis were to be possible).
The court will set an expedited hearing to decide whether the Order is to be extended.
09 March, 2017
State of Hawai'i and Ismail Elshikh v Donald J Trump and others (1)
Legal action has been commenced against the Executive Order issued on 6th March by President Donald J Trump - Executive Order 13780. The action is State of Hawai'i and Ismail Elshikh v Donald J Trump and others. Mr Elshikh is Imam of the Muslim Association of Hawai'i.
See CNN News 9th March - Judge to hear Hawai'i lawsuit against new Trump travel ban and The Telegraph 9th March - Hawai'i becomes first State to take legal action against Donald Trump over new travel order
The new Executive Order may be read via the US Federal Register - Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry to the United States. The new Order will replace EO 13769 on 16th March.
Here is the document commencing the case which will be heard in the United States District Court for the District of Hawai'i. The document commencing the case lists 8 grounds of challenge against the new Executive Order.
Update - the hearing is listed for 0930 hrs HAST on 15th March before Judge Derrick K Watson
[Hawai'i is the local spelling of the State's name].
HAST = Hawaii-Aleutian Standard Time ..... 10 hours behind London time.
See CNN News 9th March - Judge to hear Hawai'i lawsuit against new Trump travel ban and The Telegraph 9th March - Hawai'i becomes first State to take legal action against Donald Trump over new travel order
The new Executive Order may be read via the US Federal Register - Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry to the United States. The new Order will replace EO 13769 on 16th March.
Here is the document commencing the case which will be heard in the United States District Court for the District of Hawai'i. The document commencing the case lists 8 grounds of challenge against the new Executive Order.
Update - the hearing is listed for 0930 hrs HAST on 15th March before Judge Derrick K Watson
[Hawai'i is the local spelling of the State's name].
HAST = Hawaii-Aleutian Standard Time ..... 10 hours behind London time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)